It Will Accomplish Nothing

It Is Unconstitutional

It Will Cost Democrats Dearly In The Mid-Terms

It Will Cost A Huge Amount To Money

The proposed ban will face strong opposition from the states

Click Here For More

This is a highly deceptive bill that is supposedly a simple review of the National Instant Check System (NICS) – but is in reality a  federal gun owner registration bill.  Currently, the law requires that approved background checks be deleted from the system within 24 hours (obviously denials may be kept for a variety of reasons, including criminal prosecution).  This was written into the NICS bill in order to prevent the federal government from compiling a list of gun owners.  It is possible that the bill may eventually be amended to provide for the collection of firearms information as well, but it is not required at this point.  That said, this bill would definitely permit the federal government to collect and retain the personal information of all future gun buyers FOREVER.

(Click HERE for more.)

---

Those of us who have been involved in the gun rights battle for some time have often heard gun control advocates try to nullify the operative clause (“the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”) by referring to the preface (“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State”) and arguing that the 2nd Amendment only protects the right of states to maintain the National Guard.  Of course, this absurd argument was rejected by the Supreme Court in Heller and McDonald, which ruled that the 2A protects “a personal right unconnected with militia service”.

However, there is a major error in reasoning when equating the National Guard. and the state militia.  The error is found in the very name “National Guard” - it is a national force that is ultimately in control of the national – not state governments.  It is therefore NOT a state militia.  So, what state’s right does the 2nd Amendment protect?

(Click here for more.)

---

In 2020, before the election, the Las Vega Sun obtained a very rare interview with then candidate Joe Biden.  However, instead of running it before the election, they held it.  One could be forgiven for wondering why – until you read it.  Biden does something he avoided during the bulk of the campaign – he talks about gun control.  In fact, he makes four outrageous statements on the subject.

Click Here For More

---

Since When Is Iowa, A Shall Issue Concealed Carry State, An Example Of Strict Gun Laws?

This Rutgers “study” is pure propaganda.  They chose New York as one example of a “strict gun laws” state, because it had a much lower crime rate during NYC’s “stop and frisk” policy – which just happened to coincide with the years of their study. Unbelievably, they chose Iowa as a “strict gun laws” state!

Click Here For More

---

Federal Court Affirms That Government May Not Charge A Fee For The Exercise Of A Constitutionally Protected Right

---

California’s Magazine Case – Currently One Step Away From SCOTUS

Current Carry Cases With A Good Chance To Reach The Supreme Court

---

Scrutiny and How the Federal Courts Work
Basic orientation for 2nd Amendment advocates

---

Five Reasons Why 2nd Amendment Sanctuaries Present A Huge Problem For Biden’s Gun Control Push

---

The Real Reason Gun Control Groups Oppose Firearms Suppressor Deregulation

---